Welcome to The Stats Lab, your new home for advanced analysis and insights for fantasy sportsWelcome to The Stats Lab
---
NWM walks in on form. Port Adelaide rank 13th for defender concede at -3.3% — a mild negative overall — but goals conceded to opposition defenders at +19.0% (3rd) is the relevant positive for the way NWM scores. Kicks at -5.4% (15th) is the significant headwind; his game runs through contested possession and ball-winning rather than pure kick volume. No tag. Starts.
Geelong rank 8th for defender concede at +1.8%. Handballs at +11.3% (2nd) and tackles at +10.1% (2nd) are the standout positives — Ash generates heavily through short disposal and contested ball-winning and this matchup feeds it directly. Marks at -8.3% (14th) is the only notable negative. His prediction of 130 is 2.4% above his season average of 127.
Brisbane rank 18th (last) for defender concede at -11.3% — kicks at -11.6% (17th), marks at -25.0% (18th). Roberts's prediction of 121 is 6.2% below his season average of 129, the full matchup discount applied. Named after a doubtful week with his shoulder. Selected on season average alone; the most volatile pick in the defensive group.
Adelaide rank 11th for defender concede at -2.6% — neutral-to-negative overall. The standout positive is goals at +41.6% (2nd) — the Crows are one of the most generous teams in the competition for defender goals. Noble's prediction matches his season average exactly at 121. Consistent. Named.
North Melbourne rank 17th for defender concede at -9.3% — kicks at -12.7% (18th) the most damaging stat for Daicos's kick-heavy game. His prediction of 113 is 1.7% below his season average of 115. Selected on season average depth; the matchup is a headwind he'll need to overcome through volume. Named.
Carlton rank 12th for defender concede at -2.8% — broadly neutral across all stats. Sicily's prediction of 112 is 2.8% above his season average of 109, mild recent form upside. Named.
The standout matchup upgrade in the defensive line. Essendon rank 3rd for defender concede at +6.8% — kicks at +8.1% (2nd) and marks at +19.5% (2nd) are excellent for Wilmot's disposal-and-intercept game. His prediction of 111 is 4.7% above his season average of 106. Named.
---
GWS rank 12th for midfielder concede at -1.5% — a mild negative. Handballs at +6.9% (2nd) is the clear positive for Smith's running, contested game. Kicks at -3.3% (15th) and marks at -7.0% (13th) are the negatives. Selection built on volume and CBA access. At 144 predicted off a season average of 143, the model is simply backing him to be Bailey Smith.
Gold Coast rank 6th for midfielder concede at +1.0%. Goals conceded at +37.1% (2nd) is the headline — the Suns allow more goals to opposition midfielders than virtually any team in the competition. Dawson converts possession into score involvement at a high rate and this matchup feeds it directly. His prediction of 144 is 4.3% above his season average of 138.
Fremantle rank 17th for midfielder concede at -3.6% — marks at -20.8% (18th) the most damaging stat for Heeney's scoring profile. The model backs his season average of 127 against the matchup discount, with tackles at +10.3% (3rd) the genuine positive. Named after a doubtful week.
Shares the Giants matchup with Bailey Smith — handballs at +6.9% (2nd) the main positive. His prediction of 126 is 2.4% above his season average of 123. The same matchup logic applies a tier below Smith. Named.
The best midfielder matchup on the board. West Coast rank 2nd for midfielder concede at +4.6% — kicks at +5.0% (2nd), marks at +6.9% (6th), tackles at +8.1% (4th), goals at +27.9% (4th). Every accumulation stat above league average. Richards's prediction of 124 is 2.5% above his season average of 121. Named.
Brisbane rank 4th for midfielder concede at +3.6%. Goals conceded at +39.1% (1st) — the Lions allow more goals to opposition midfielders than any team in the competition. Merrett's prediction of 123 sits 3.9% below his season average of 128, mild form discount against an excellent matchup. Named.
St Kilda rank 15th for midfielder concede at -3.0% — kicks at -6.0% (17th) the main negative for Butters's kick-heavy game. His prediction of 121 is 3.9% below his season average of 126. Earns his spot on season average depth; the Saints matchup is working against him. Named.
---
Richmond rank 7th for ruck concede at +6.1% — marks at +20.3% (3rd) and tackles at +17.3% (3rd) the headline positives. Goals at +85.0% (3rd) is eye-catching though ruck goal numbers are small in absolute terms. Gawn's prediction matches his season average of 125. Named. Straightforward.
Sydney rank 9th for ruck concede at -1.5% — effectively neutral. Goals at +66.5% (4th), handballs at +6.5% (6th) and tackles at +5.6% (9th) are mild positives. His prediction of 118 is 3.3% below his season average of 122. Sean Darcy managed out — Jackson is the undisputed #1 Fremantle ruck and gets all the premium minutes. Named.
---
Collingwood rank 6th for forward concede at +1.9% — kicks at +6.0% (2nd), handballs at +5.6% (3rd), marks at +6.5% (4th) all positive. Tackles at -18.6% (18th) is the one notable caveat — the Magpies are the hardest team in the competition for forwards to generate tackles against — but Sheezel's disposal-and-mark game doesn't depend on it. When he pushes through the midfield, the Magpies rank 11th for midfielder concede at -0.5% — broadly neutral, with marks at +11.4% (3rd) and kicks at +3.2% (5th) remaining positive. Named. Leads the forward line.
The best forward matchup on the board. Richmond rank 1st for forward concede at +11.2% — kicks at +11.6% (1st), handballs at +8.8% (2nd), marks at +20.2% (1st). Every accumulation stat above league average. When Pickett pushes through the midfield, the Tigers rank 9th for midfielder concede at -0.3% — effectively neutral overall, though marks at +18.9% (2nd) remain an exceptional positive. Pickett's prediction of 123 is 6.0% above his season average of 116. Named.
Essendon rank 2nd for forward concede at +5.4% — handballs at +9.3% (1st), marks at +12.2% (3rd), kicks at +5.4% (4th). The Bombers are permissive across every key forward accumulation stat. The midfield numbers are even better — Essendon rank 1st for midfielder concede at +8.9%, with kicks at +10.9% (1st) and marks at +37.8% (1st). When Bailey floats through the midfield he finds the most generous scoring environment in the competition. His prediction of 116 is 13.7% above his season average of 102 — the largest absolute premium in the forward group. Named.
Gold Coast rank 5th for forward concede at +2.3% — goals at +6.9% (4th) and marks at +3.5% (6th) the most relevant positives for Rankine's scoring profile. Through the midfield the Suns rank 6th at +1.0% for midfielder concede, with goals at +37.1% (2nd) — the Suns allow goals to opposing midfielders at a rate that makes Rankine's goal-kicking upside even more compelling when he pushes into the middle. His prediction of 107 is 1.8% below his season average of 109. Named.
Port Adelaide rank 10th for forward concede at +0.2% — essentially neutral overall. The standout positive is tackles at +16.1% (1st) — the Power are the hardest team in the competition to avoid being tackled by, which suits Hill's contested game directly. Through the midfield Port rank 16th at -3.5% for midfielder concede — a headwind, with marks at -11.9% (15th) notably soft. His prediction of 104 essentially matches his season average of 105. Named.
Geelong rank 9th for forward concede at +1.2% — kicks at +2.2% (7th), marks at +3.1% (9th) mild positives. Through the midfield the Cats rank 10th at -0.4% — effectively neutral, with tackles at +7.9% (5th) the main positive when Greene wins contested ball through the middle. His prediction of 101 is 2.9% below his season average of 104. Named. Experience and goal-kicking upside provide his floor.
Shares the Tigers matchup with Pickett — Richmond 1st for forward concede at +11.2%, kicks at +11.6% (1st), marks at +20.2% (1st). Through the midfield the picture holds — Tigers rank 9th for midfielder concede at -0.3%, with marks at +18.9% (2nd) remaining a strong positive when Sparrow pushes through the centre. His prediction matches his season average of 100 exactly. Named.
The rest of the Squad to Beat is for premium subscribers. $24.99/month, cancel anytime.
Get Premium — $24.99/mo